Tyler Zink vs Rafael De Alba Estadísticas cara a cara, resultados y comparación de rendimiento
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L W L L
Form
L L L L LCara A Cara: Zink 1 - 0 Alba
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Zink victoriosa 2 y Alba victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Zink y Alba fue en el Morelia Challenger, el 23-03-2025, Cuartos de Q1 round, Hard, con Tyler Zink obteniendo la victoria 6-3 6-4
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tyler Zink | 1 |
| Rafael De Alba | 0 |
Morelia Challenger(23-03-2025)
6
3
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 12 | Juegos Ganados | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Faltas dobles totales | 9 |
| 1:13:16 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 1:13:16 |
| 43% (26/60) | % De Primer Servicio | 64% (37/58) |
| 81% (21/26) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 70% (26/37) |
| 56% (19/34) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 19% (4/21) |
| 40% (4/10) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 48% (28/58) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 33% (20/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Tyler Zink
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Tyler Zink
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
34 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Tyler Zink
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Jack Kennedy
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Tyler Zink
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Tyler Zink
42%
(
25 of
60)
1st Serve %
38%
(
25 of
66)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
92%
(
23 of
25)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Alfredo Perez
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
20 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Aidan Mayo
54%
(
58 of
108)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
9
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
60%
(
30 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
41 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Tyler Zink
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Rafael De Alba
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
Player
Rafael De Alba
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karl Poling
Player
Rafael De Alba
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marcus Willis
Player
Rafael De Alba
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
6
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rafael De Alba
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (78/64) | Win/Loss | 44% (21/27) |
| 52% (169/154) | Sets Win/Loss | 36% (41/74) |
| 51% (1586/1523) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (488/589) |
| 55% (41/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) |
| 51% (21/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) |
| 62% (16/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 592 | Aces Total | 44 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 299 | Total Double Faults | 131 |
| 1:32:37 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 436.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 312.06 |
| 59% (5218/8833) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1183/1968) |
| 70% (3657/5218) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (737/1183) |
| 51% (1830/3615) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (307/785) |
| 39% (318/817) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (61/138) |
| 38% (3200/8483) | Return Points Win % | 36% (668/1833) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (12/14) | Challenger W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 57% (66/50) | Futures W/L | 53% (19/17) |
| 55% (77/141) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (19/51) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (17/40) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 65% (26/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 83% (10/12) |
| 89% (79/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (16/15) |
| 11% (79/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (16/1) |
| 13% (63/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (37/4) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
